The Tripura Chapter of the INDI Bloc will march to the Chief Electoral Officer’s office in Agartala on October 30 after gathering at Orient Chowmuhani at 11 am, demanding the cancellation of the SIR exercise, the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and safeguards for electoral integrity.
Key Takeaways:
-
The INDI Bloc’s Tripura unit will march to the CEO’s office on October 30 with a four-point charter of demands.
-
CPIM State secretary Jitendra Chaudhury and Congress president Ashish Kumar Saha have questioned the SIR process and the Election Commission’s neutrality.
-
The Agartala protest forms part of the opposition alliance’s wider agitation to protect voting rights and demand electoral reforms.
Opposition parties in Tripura under the INDI Bloc platform are eyeing to scale up pressure against the Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.
Demanding the cancellation of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), INDI Bloc will hold a protest in Agartala on October 30.
The programme will form part of the opposition alliance’s wider campaign over voter-list revision and the Election Commission’s functioning.
The protest will begin at Orient Chowmuhani at 11 am. INDI Bloc leaders, workers and supporters will then march to the office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Tripura to submit a memorandum outlining their demands.
CPIM State secretary Jitendra Chaudhury announced the programme at a press conference at Agartala Press Club on Saturday. Tripura Pradesh Congress Committee president Ashish Kumar Saha also raised concerns about voting rights and the Election Commission’s neutrality.
Chaudhury Questions Election Commission’s Neutrality
Addressing the press conference, Chaudhury alleged that the BJP-led Union government was weakening the country’s electoral system and constitutional framework. He questioned the Election Commission of India’s neutrality and expressed concern that the electoral process could favour the ruling party.
Chaudhury also criticised the SIR exercise and questioned the role of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. He warned that the revision could lead to the deletion of a large number of eligible voters from electoral rolls.
He referred to discussions suggesting that around 2.5 lakh voters in Tripura could lose their names from the rolls. However, the press conference did not establish whether this figure had independent verification or support from official data.
The concerns raised by the Tripura opposition leaders reflect the INDI Bloc’s broader campaign against the SIR process. Opposition parties across the country have alleged irregularities in voter lists and unauthorised exclusions. They have also questioned the Election Commission’s decision-making and raised concerns about disagreements among its officials.
Four-Point Charter of Demands
The INDI Bloc’s proposed Agartala protest will focus on four demands.
The first is the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The second is the cancellation of the SIR process. The third calls for a review and repeal of relevant laws to protect the Election Commission’s neutrality and the democratic framework. The fourth opposes provisions granting legal protection to the Chief Election Commissioner.
Chaudhury said opposition parties must unite to protect democracy and uphold the Constitution. He described the October 30 programme as part of a wider struggle to safeguard citizens’ voting rights and democratic institutions.
The alliance’s national campaign also includes demands for the restoration of omitted voters’ names and wider electoral reforms. Opposition parties have raised the issue of returning to paper ballots. However, these broader demands do not form part of the four-point charter announced for the Tripura protest.
Congress Raises Concerns Over Voter Exclusion
Saha also questioned the Election Commission’s functioning under Gyanesh Kumar. He alleged that important decisions were being taken by sidelining the other two Election Commissioners.
Referring to allegations raised by the Leader of Opposition (LoP) in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, Saha said Gandhi had presented information and documents concerning the electoral process and voter lists before the public. He also cited an investigative report published by The Indian Express, which he said had added a new dimension to the controversy.
Saha alleged that the SIR exercise could deprive people perceived as opposition supporters of their voting rights. He questioned changes to established procedures for enrolling voters and the introduction of new forms. According to him, these changes could benefit the ruling BJP.
He also raised concerns about alleged irregularities in voter registrations at residential complexes and cases in which the same person’s name appeared on electoral rolls at multiple locations.
Citing an allegation concerning an area in North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal, Saha claimed that more than 13,000 voters had been registered at a single address. These allegations and figures require independent verification through official records.
Agartala Protest Joins Wider Opposition Agitation
The INDI Bloc’s campaign against the SIR process has extended beyond individual states. Opposition parties have organised demonstrations and marches in New Delhi and other places, demanding accountability from the Election Commission and the removal of Gyanesh Kumar.
The alliance has pursued political and legal measures alongside street protests. Opposition leaders have maintained that the agitation should continue while legal challenges proceed.
The Election Commission has defended its decisions on the SIR process, maintaining that its actions comply with the Constitution and the law. The BJP and government representatives have rejected the opposition’s criticism.
Against this backdrop, the October 30 programme will allow the INDI Bloc’s Tripura unit to press its demands locally.
Saha said the movement was not intended to serve the electoral interests of any particular political party. He described it as a campaign to protect citizens’ voting rights and preserve the integrity of democratic institutions.
He appealed to political parties outside the INDI Bloc and people who believe in democracy to join the agitation.
Targeting the ruling party in Tripura, Saha argued that an electoral victory did not necessarily reflect the full extent of public support. He also accused political forces of using money and muscle power to influence elections.
Both Chaudhury and Saha called for wider opposition unity. They presented the campaign as a broader struggle to protect voting rights, democracy and the Constitution.
